Subject: Re: Posible virc(8) implementation
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: Scott Aaron Bamford <>
List: current-users
Date: 05/04/2000 18:53:27
On Thu, 4 May 2000, Jonathan Stone wrote:

>In message <>,
>Scott Aaron Bamford writes:
>>This would only be to help peoples first time transit from non-rc.d to rc.d.
>What about people who have good, perhaps even compelling reasons,
>to _never_ switch to rc.d?

someone made a post before about keeping a monolithic rc and rc.conf
up to date in a seperate tree, i dont know if any development has continued
on this; however the current virc -s would put all the `current values' from
the rc.conf.d that you are not using, into one conf that could be hand tuned
if needed.  It would be no use at all though if there wasnt a monolithic rc
kept up to date too...

 ------------------------------ `6_6  )   `-.  (     ).`-.__.`) |        (_Y_.)'  ._   )  `._ `. ``-..-' |      _..`--'_..-_/  /--'_.' ,'
 --------------------------- (il),-''  (li),'  ((!.-' ----