Subject: Re: postfix
To: Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com>
From: Andrew Brown <atatat@atatdot.net>
List: current-users
Date: 05/01/2000 22:37:57
>> I see - it hasn't made it to
>> http://src.doc.ic.ac.uk/packages/NetBSD-current/src/etc/rc.d yet. Still
>> wonder about mailer/mailer.conf though..
>
>For very obvious reasons we can't get rid of mailwrapper so long as
>both sendmail and postfix are in the tree. Think about why it is
>needed in the first place.
i like the mailwrapper solution. i think it should stay, no matter
what. okay...perhaps it's not *completely* clean (eg, executing
sendmail will get you a mailwrapper'ed something, but man sendmail
will get yout eh sendmail man page), but it's a nice solution.
--
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior@daemon.org * "ah! i see you have the internet
twofsonet@graffiti.com (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!"
andrew@crossbar.com * "information is power -- share the wealth."