Subject: Re: sendmail and netbsd
To: Perry E. Metzger <email@example.com>
From: Andrew Brown <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/01/2000 17:08:51
>> now...getting back to my original question: can someone cite specific
>> portions of the sendmail licence and explain why they're not
>> compatible with netbsd's goals?
>You are now required to supply source. Any more questions?
this clause then?
1. Redistributions qualify as "freeware" or "Open Source Software" under
one of the following terms:
(a) Redistributions are made at no charge beyond the reasonable cost of
materials and delivery.
(b) Redistributions are accompanied by a copy of the Source Code or by an
irrevocable offer to provide a copy of the Source Code for up to three
years at the cost of materials and delivery. Such redistributions
must allow further use, modification, and redistribution of the Source
Code under substantially the same terms as this license. For the
purposes of redistribution "Source Code" means the complete compilable
and linkable source code of sendmail including all modifications.
how come we can't just satisfy part a?
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
email@example.com * "ah! i see you have the internet
firstname.lastname@example.org (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!"
email@example.com * "information is power -- share the wealth."