Subject: make for rc.d? (was Re: rc.d)
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Aaron J. Grier <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 04/25/2000 15:50:03
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 10:26:14AM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> The static route should go into a script that depends on the network
> script having been run (since you need the network interfaces up). The
> local daemon should go into a script that depends on whatever it needs
> up in order to run....
why do we need rcorder? why not just use make? when we get
multiprocessor working, we could do parallel makes, even.
it seems like figuring out dependencies is _exactly_ what make is for...
Aaron J. Grier | "Not your ordinary poofy goof." | email@example.com