># Although mk.conf _is_ for pkgsrc, it's probably a better idea to ship it
># within pkgsrc itself. It's not needed otherwise, right?
>
>mk.conf is NOT just for pkgsrc if it's in /etc.  It's for building any-
>thing, really.  For example, I put the directives in there so that it
>doesn't build profiling libs when I build my system (I use them so
>infrequently...).

it's not specifically for pkgsrc, no, but aren't most of the things it
contains in there because of pkgsrc requiring so many knobs and
buttons?

-- 
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior@daemon.org             * "ah!  i see you have the internet
twofsonet@graffiti.com (Andrew Brown)                that goes *ping*!"
andrew@crossbar.com       * "information is power -- share the wealth."