Bcc: 
Subject: Re: Possible design of the new rc.d rc.conf stuff.
Reply-To: 
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.10.10004182350380.3605-100000@pc1.whooppee.com>

On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 11:51:43PM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:
> Yup, read_conf_dir_first would be an acceptable name.  Certainly much
> better than my idea of monolithic_conf_preferred !!!  :)
> 
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Todd Whitesel wrote:
> > I submit that the use of "preferred" is the problem here.
> > How about "read_conf_dir_first" or something similar?
> > Either that or include a comment explaining that "preferred" means run last.

Or, for a more self-documenting name, in terms of what effect the order has:
	conf_dir_overrides_rc_conf= ?

eric