current-users: Re: proposed pax changes (was Big problems with snapshot/20000226, part 1)

Subject: Re: proposed pax changes (was Big problems with snapshot/20000226, part 1)
To: Greywolf <greywolf@starwolf.com>
From: Johan Danielsson <joda@pdc.kth.se>
List: current-users
Date: 03/06/2000 11:22:24

Greywolf <greywolf@starwolf.com> writes:

> ...why?  pax is supposed to be the be-all end-all archiver with no
> GPL attached to it.

Does it do --unlink?

/Johan