"Brian C. Grayson" wrote:
>   Of course, the proper course of action is to do a proper sysctl
> that returns everything ps needs, in a carefully-constructed
> format that is not directly tied to any internal kernel
> structure layout.  That way, we'll never have problems ever
> again.
> 
>   Any volunteers?  :)  I've been meaning to work on this for
> months now, but don't envision I'll make any progress in the
> next few months either.  :(

I wanted to work on this, too, but didn't find time up to now
and I have other projects to do now :( It would be really neat
if someone would take this project and implemented clean
sysctl interface.

Jaromir