Subject: Re: vi update?
To: Miles Nordin <carton@Ivy.NET>
From: Jerry Alexandratos <email@example.com>
Date: 02/22/2000 18:39:20
On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 04:16:51PM -0700, Miles Nordin wrote:
: This is crufty and complicated, but would produce a considerable social
: good. Does anyone know to what extent BSD developers have opened a
: dialogue with the FSF, regarding whether or not this
: minimum-useful-adjustment fits with their idealogy? They are in a much
: better position to change their license than we are.
I think the reasoning probably falls under the ideological constraints
of the FSF. There's no point in co-habitating with BSD code, since the
BSD license carries the stigma of not requiring source redistribution.
BSD: "do what you like with our code how you like,
just give us some credit since you used our stuff"
GPL: "I am RMS of FSF, your patches and code enhancements
will be assimilated into this copylefted source.
Resistence is futile..."
name: Jerry Alexandratos || Open-Source software isn't a
phone: 302.593.4322 || matter of life or death...
email: firstname.lastname@example.org || ...It's much more important
|| than that!