Subject: Re: vi update?
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
Date: 02/21/2000 00:29:27
>> Then why don't we have more public-domain code in our tree? As it
>> stands, our code cannot, for example, be used in sufficiently close
>> conjunction with GPLed code.
> That is total and complete nonsense.
Not as I read the licenses; the GPL requires that if you distribute the
result, it must *all* be distributable under the GPL...and most of our
code cannot be distributed under the GPL; certainly not that with
advertising clauses ("must bear the text...contains code by J Random
At least as of last time I read the GPL.
> For an example, note there is BSD-licenced code in the base Linux
> kernel distribution.
Does the license contain an advertising clause? (Which file? I should
probably just go read the license myself rather than asking questions
about it here.)
7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B