Subject: Re: wireless / dhcp
To: der Mouse <email@example.com>
From: Michael Richardson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/16/2000 14:43:36
>>>>> "der" == der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA> writes:
>>> The last time this came up I wondered  whether perhaps an
>>> interface flag could be invented to mean "do dhcp".
der> Probably. Aren't there over a dozen bits still unassigned?
I like "IFF_AUTOCONF" or some such.
>> Or "this isn't a physical interface, even though it says
der> Why on earth would anyone think IFF_BROADCAST has anything whatsoever
der> to do with being a "physical interface" (whatever *that* is)?
If it doesn't say "broadcast", then you can't do DHCP anyway, so it didn't
matter. If you have "ep0" and "ppp0" in your kernel, then dhcp would only try
on the one that coincidentally also was a physical interface.
] Out and about in Ottawa. hmmm... beer. | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] email@example.com http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another NetBSD/notebook using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [