Subject: Re: semctl(2) changes
To: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Thor Lancelot Simon <email@example.com>
Date: 01/31/2000 13:29:25
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 01:25:21PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> On Jan 31, 1:18pm, firstname.lastname@example.org (Thor Lancelot Simon) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: semctl(2) changes
> | I think this is a mistake, because it doesn't take into account the
> | literally thousands of copies of 1.4M kicking around out there on Comdex
> | Snapshot CDs.
> | For example, 50 of Bill's and my students at Stevens Tech have this
> | installed on their machines (as do all the machines in my lab) and we
> | handed out Many copies at various trade shows -- at least a thousand.
> Could be, but can you name 1 (one) statically linked binary that uses
Off the top of my head, no. On the other hand, I can think of _plenty_
of moderately clueless NetBSD users who are likely to upgrade only their
kernels and be very confused when 1.4M packages they've built or acquired
Thor Lancelot Simon email@example.com
"And where do all these highways go, now that we are free?"