Subject: Re: sh problem
To: None <>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
List: current-users
Date: 01/25/2000 10:21:58
> OK, one more time.  sh doesn't return the logical negative of the
> second command in a pipeline when the pipeline is preceeded by '!'.

Unless it's a two-command pipeline, it shouldn't. :-)

But yes, this agrees with my observations too.  I don't see it as
relevant to what ! ( cmd | cmd ) should return, though.

					der Mouse

		     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B