Subject: Re: sh problem
To: None <email@example.com>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
Date: 01/25/2000 10:21:58
> OK, one more time. sh doesn't return the logical negative of the
> second command in a pipeline when the pipeline is preceeded by '!'.
Unless it's a two-command pipeline, it shouldn't. :-)
But yes, this agrees with my observations too. I don't see it as
relevant to what ! ( cmd | cmd ) should return, though.
7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B