Subject: Re: raidframe /?
To: Greg Oster <>
From: Peter Seebach <>
List: current-users
Date: 01/20/2000 17:08:09
In message <>, Greg Oster writes:
>"Easier said than done", unfortunately :(  I took a kick at this a few 
>months back, and ran into some Really Hard chicken-and-egg problems 
>(ignoring the 'configuration before really having a filesystem' issues).  
>I do intend to keep poking at this until it does eventually work, but I
>can't guarantee a time-frame for success at this point :(

No problem, just curious.

>(One of the problems was a circular dependency between having kernel threads 
>and having a / filesystem.  You currently need / before you can get threads, 
>but I need the threads for RAIDframe in order to get / working :( )

Ah.  Well, I won't try to do it, then.  ;-)