Subject: Re: raidframe /?
To: Greg Oster <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Peter Seebach <email@example.com>
Date: 01/20/2000 17:08:09
In message <200001202308.RAA01583@cs.usask.ca>, Greg Oster writes:
>"Easier said than done", unfortunately :( I took a kick at this a few
>months back, and ran into some Really Hard chicken-and-egg problems
>(ignoring the 'configuration before really having a filesystem' issues).
>I do intend to keep poking at this until it does eventually work, but I
>can't guarantee a time-frame for success at this point :(
No problem, just curious.
>(One of the problems was a circular dependency between having kernel threads
>and having a / filesystem. You currently need / before you can get threads,
>but I need the threads for RAIDframe in order to get / working :( )
Ah. Well, I won't try to do it, then. ;-)