Subject: Re: Bringing CVS Into the Tree
To: None <>
From: Simon Burge <>
List: current-users
Date: 01/11/2000 00:09:18
Todd Whitesel wrote:

> Now the flame war: base or comp?

The same as RCS?  That would be "base"...

Feico Dillema wrote:

> Hmmm, anybody want to CVS sources without compiling them? I'd see
> comp would be the logical place.

CVS can also be a very good tool for configuration management (stuff in
/etc, etc :) - one could argue on production boxes that CVS could be
more useful than the C compiler.  You don't need to be able to compile
for CVS to be useful.

That said, it doesn't worry me if CVS is in the core of NetBSD or a