Subject: Re: Bringing CVS Into the Tree
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Simon Burge <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/11/2000 00:09:18
Todd Whitesel wrote:
> Now the flame war: base or comp?
The same as RCS? That would be "base"...
Feico Dillema wrote:
> Hmmm, anybody want to CVS sources without compiling them? I'd see
> comp would be the logical place.
CVS can also be a very good tool for configuration management (stuff in
/etc, etc :) - one could argue on production boxes that CVS could be
more useful than the C compiler. You don't need to be able to compile
for CVS to be useful.
That said, it doesn't worry me if CVS is in the core of NetBSD or a