Subject: Re: RFC: Simple screen editor for NetBSD
To: Antti Kantee <email@example.com>
From: John Hayward <John.C.Hayward@wheaton.edu>
Date: 01/07/2000 16:02:59
> The reasonable choises are perhaps as you say ee from FreeBSD and
> perhaps ae from Debian Linux. I haven't used either, so I can't really
> tell. Has anyone ported MS-DOS edit? ;)
I'd recommend pico which comes with pine.
The main advantage pico has is that it is NOT a mode editor. Mode editors
like vi and emacs increase the learning curve - Also editors which don't
have menu items are not as good for occational users.
> .. how about we just add vilearn to the base set? ;P
Thanks for the pointer to vilearn - we are finally getting rid of our
ultrix machine which had learn on it and I pointed new students to learn
vi. Now I have an alternative.
> "Never underestimate the power of the Lite side of the \Source/"
> Antti Kantee / NetBSD \ 1973 <- draken \ / o
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> / http://www.netbsd.org \ platters -> 1999 \ / |
> ______________/ Free Multiplatform UN*X \___________________\/__ |