Subject: Re: Frame Maker & our portmap
To: Matthias Drochner <M.Drochner@fz-juelich.de>
From: Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
Date: 12/20/1999 22:45:26
On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Matthias Drochner wrote:
> So ok, can you try the appended patch?
I've tried your patches, and they work if one has a portmap running with
-ld flags. As this is not the normal case, I wonder how anyone should ever
notice such lossage if it doesn't occur as massive as w/ FrameMaker (i.e.
if it's just 1-2 requests that get lost, without the spinning FM does).
Then again, with such apps as FM, logfiles may fill quickly if we enable
this by default. I think we should leave it off.
One minor nit: Please s/"decline/" decline/g in the two cases to add some
portmap: connect from 220.127.116.11 to set(1138727320) declined (non-loopback sender)
NetBSD - Better for your uptime than Viagra