Subject: Re: jdk?
To: Scott Bartram <email@example.com>
From: Dustin Sallings <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/11/1999 23:19:59
On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Scott Bartram wrote:
# I started a JDK 1.2 port a couple of months ago but it keeps getting
# pushed down on the priority list. Again, you can get the source from
# Sun and then start with the Linux patches (www.blackdown.org) and then
# finish the port from there.
The linux version *almost* works on my -current box. It'd be
really cool to have an official distribution, though. :)
I'm fairly disappointed with jdk, however. If it's supposed to be
so great and ``write once, run everywhere,'' and all that, why don't they
make a version of jdk that you can actually *build*? The jdk 1.2
distribution lists jdk 1.2 as a requirement (in addition to Solaris and
Windows). What's up with that?
dustin sallings The world is watching America,
http://2852210114/~dustin/ and America is watching TV.