Subject: Re: non-POSIX conforming semctl???
To: John Nemeth <email@example.com>
From: Jason Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/02/1999 15:07:42
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999 13:36:25 -0800
email@example.com (John Nemeth) wrote:
> This just came across the mod_ssl mailing list. Does anybody know
> anything about it?
> On Nov 2, 11:24am, "Ralf S. Engelschall" wrote:
> } Subject: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.4.7
> } Another round to make the stable 2.4 series even more robust and clean:
> } [snip]
> } Fetch it now from:
> } o http://www.modssl.org/source/
> } o ftp://ftp.modssl.org/source/
> } Changes with mod_ssl 2.4.7 (22-Oct-1999 to 02-Nov-1999)
> } *) Disabled SysV IPC semaphore based mutex variant for FreeBSD < 3.0 and
> } any OpenBSD and NetBSD platforms because of conflicts with their
> } non-POSIX conforming semctl(2) prototypes.
No idea what that is about; I *personally* updated NetBSD-current's
semctl(2), etc. to SUSv2 conformance. Can you get more detail from
them; I'm guessing they're at NetBSD 1.4.x still.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>