Subject: Re: non-POSIX conforming semctl???
To: John Nemeth <jnemeth@victoria.tc.ca>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
List: current-users
Date: 11/02/1999 15:07:42
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999 13:36:25 -0800 
 jnemeth@victoria.tc.ca (John Nemeth) wrote:

 >      This just came across the mod_ssl mailing list.  Does anybody know
 > anything about it?
 > 
 > On Nov 2, 11:24am, "Ralf S. Engelschall" wrote:
 > } Subject: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.4.7
 > } 
 > } Another round to make the stable 2.4 series even more robust and clean:
 > } [snip]
 > } 
 > } Fetch it now from:
 > } 
 > }   o http://www.modssl.org/source/
 > }   o  ftp://ftp.modssl.org/source/
 > } 
 > }   Changes with mod_ssl 2.4.7 (22-Oct-1999 to 02-Nov-1999)
 > } 
 > }    *) Disabled SysV IPC semaphore based mutex variant for FreeBSD < 3.0 and
 > }       any OpenBSD and NetBSD platforms because of conflicts with their
 > }       non-POSIX conforming semctl(2) prototypes.

No idea what that is about; I *personally* updated NetBSD-current's
semctl(2), etc. to SUSv2 conformance.  Can you get more detail from
them; I'm guessing they're at NetBSD 1.4.x still.

        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>