Subject: re: pax questions...
To: Charles M. Hannum <>
From: matthew green <>
List: current-users
Date: 11/02/1999 03:40:34
   > I noticed some recent changes to pax that I don't understand.  If someone out
   > there knows what
   > 	flg |= CAF;
   > is intended to do, I'd love to know more about it.  :)
   UTSL.  That's a magic variable used to determine if options were
   specified that are invalid for the mode.


actually, this may be a bug?  CAF is not tested anywhere, unlike
the other flag defines ... (CAF was introduced with peter's -A
implemention, by tron?  i have not read the original PR.)