Subject: re: pax questions...
To: Charles M. Hannum <email@example.com>
From: matthew green <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/02/1999 03:40:34
> I noticed some recent changes to pax that I don't understand. If someone out
> there knows what
> flg |= CAF;
> is intended to do, I'd love to know more about it. :)
UTSL. That's a magic variable used to determine if options were
specified that are invalid for the mode.
actually, this may be a bug? CAF is not tested anywhere, unlike
the other flag defines ... (CAF was introduced with peter's -A
implemention, by tron? i have not read the original PR.)