Subject: Re: Vuegscan 620S
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Brett Lymn <email@example.com>
Date: 10/11/1999 11:31:06
According to Feico Dillema:
>I think maybe the best thing to do, is to completely remove the ss*
My thoughts were more along the lines of just lightly hacking over the
uk* and calling it ss*. Leave the old TWAIN code there ifdef'ed out
just in case someone wants it. I think it is important that if we
have a scsi scanner driver that it be made to work correctly -
according to the principle of least surprise. This is not the case at
> I cannot imagine anybody preferring it over SANE+uk* even
>for the supported scanners.
Neither can I but it cannot hurt to have it there just in case.
> Last time I checked, it looked like
>the ss* code wasn't very elegant and portable
I agree it is neither but I am wary about trashing code that someone
may be relying on.
> (I think it uses
Hehehe - I think the jury was out on that issue still.
Brett Lymn, Computer Systems Administrator, British Aerospace Australia