Subject: Re: NetBSD - ready for prime-time fileserving?
To: Lou GLASSY <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Herb Peyerl <email@example.com>
Date: 10/08/1999 05:24:26
Lou GLASSY <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Let's say the worst-case peak load would be 50 unix nfs clients and
> and 50 windows smb clients, simultaneously. (50+70 != 50+50, but
> some of the clients are dual boot boxes, so they can only be doing
> either nfs or smb, but not both at the same time.)
> Is NetBSD's nfs and smb subsystems robust enough to handle
> this sort of load? Has anyone already "deployed" (gack, hate that word)
> NetBSD boxes as departmental fileservers? I myself have used
> NetBSD for two or three years now, just as a desktop general
> purpose workstation, and I have heard of many
> NetBSD systems being used as webservers, routers, etc at ISPs,
> but haven't heard of NetBSD being used in a primary fileserver role.
We've "deployed" a NetBSD box at a customer site where it is being used as
an "everything server"... ie: it does NFS for 6 or so NFS clients, about
60 windows SMB clients, about 50 netatalk Mac clients... Runs a few print
queues, plus a whole whack of seperate jserv-powered development websites.
The machine is a simple PII/450 running 1.4. Has 5 18G disks on an
Adaptec 2940UW, 384MB of ram and an Intel Etherexpress 10/100...
With an earlier release of NetBSD it was suffering from bi-monthly mystery
"panics" but that seems to have been solved with 1.4 I think... Other than
that, there've been no complaints about speed to my knowledge... All of the
Mac's are graphic designers who store their project data on the server so
during a typical workday, the disks get a decent work-out...