Subject: Re: shutdown(8) Heisenbug?
To: Frederick Bruckman <email@example.com>
From: Mason Loring Bliss <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/29/1999 20:00:42
On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 06:38:59PM -0500, Frederick Bruckman wrote:
> I think you're onto something. shutdown.c in -current and 1.4.1 are
> the same, and dofast is *never* *initialized*. That's bad.
Are you saying it's bad that it's not explicitly initialized in the code,
or that the compiler's not initializing it? It's not a problem for the
code itself not to initialize it, IMHO - the language spec says that the
variable will dependably be zero with no intervention required. But maybe
that's what you're saying...?
> I looked at the m68k assembly, and egcs-1.1.1 does *not* initialize
> "dofast" to zero.
*That* is a problem, as I understand it. I'll see if I can figure it out
on my i386.
Mason Loring Bliss email@example.com They also surf who
awake ? sleep : dream; http://acheron.ne.mediaone.net only stand on waves.