Subject: Re: Building in domestic?
To: William O Ferry <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Aidan Cully <email@example.com>
Date: 09/19/1999 14:48:33
On Sat, Sep 18, 1999 at 07:19:09PM -0700, William O Ferry wrote:
> I would like to build in the domestic source tree to rebuild the
> kerberized apps that were replaced in my last upgrade. In the past I could
> simply go into domestic and build it just like the /usr/src tree. Now there
> is no Makefile in domestic or domestic/usr.bin, etc., though it seems that
> all of the old source directories are still there.
> So is there a new process to building these things, or is domestic
> just broken right now? I know I've seen talk about cryptosrc-us, but when I
> do a new sup it still seems to call itself domestic. My supfile does match
> the latest share/examples/supfile/sup.netbsd.org
> Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Build outside of domestic. You may have to add CRYPTOBASE = domestic to