Subject: Re: fortune makefiles incorrect ?
To: Darren Reed <>
From: Simon Burge <>
List: current-users
Date: 09/05/1999 16:26:13
Darren Reed wrote:

> In some email I received from Bill Sommerfeld, sie wrote:
> > > Shouldn't this be fixed to be consistant with the rest ?
> > 
> > What arguments do you think should be included?  The host compiler may
> > not be gcc...
> So ?  I guess I just don't understand why this file should be any different
> to the hundreds of others.

Because the executable runs on the host to generate the fortune .dat
files.  Think cross-compile environments...

> Hmmm, there seems to be a similar problem with usr/src/games/monop...

Same deal as previous message - "make includes".