On Sun, 8 Aug 1999, Brian Stark wrote:

: Has anyone been able to get the new gcc 2.95 to compile succesfully on
: their system (-current, or 1.4)?

-current is likely to fail, as gcc 2.95 has no clue (yet) that NetBSD/i386
can be ELF.  I have started the work to get it ported into the codebase.

As to on 1.4, my guess is that (for i386 and sparc, anyway) the C and C++
compilers _should_ compile and work.  I give no guarantees for the rest....
;-)

: /usr/local/source/gcc-2.95-i386-unknown-netbsd1.4/gcc/xgcc
: -B/usr/local/source/gcc-2.95-i386-unknown-netbsd1.4/gcc/ 
: -B/usr/local/i386-unknown-netbsd1.4/bin/ -c -I.
: -I/usr/local/source/gcc-2.95/libchill   -g -O2  
: /usr/local/source/gcc-2.95/libchill/chillstdio.c
: xgcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11

This is highly unusual; it indicates that the C compiler got a SIGSEGV.
However, some of the support libraries are a little intensive on the
compiler; you wouldn't happen to have somewhat low process limits?

-- 
-- Todd Vierling (tv@pobox.com)