On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, Tom Yu wrote:

> Sleepycat has made this offer to MIT, but we weren't interested in
> that either because it would prevent people from using db2 with
> anything other than Kerberos.  Therefore, the "db2" in the MIT
> Kerberos sources are actually more like db1.85 or something, heavily
> patched.

	Would it make sense to adopt the MIT "db2" into the base
	NetBSD distribution?

		David/absolute

	  -=-  Maybe your misinterpretation of my actions is 
	      in conflict with your misconception of who I am  -=-