Subject: RE: Conner minicartridge tape drive - quirky drive
To: Stephen Brown <sbrown@best.com>
From: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@nas.nasa.gov>
List: current-users
Date: 07/22/1999 12:39:52
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Stephen Brown wrote:
>
> I guess I've discovered two things then:
>
> 1) NetBSD's version of dump could definitely use a smarter algorithm
> for calculating tape capacity. Most versions of unix that I've
> used are fairly good at recognizing the amount of tape needed
> for a dump.
>
> The actual density code should be returned by a mode sense of the
> tape device. If dump can(when using a local tape), ask the kernel
> to give it the tape density, etc. through ioctl() calls then it would
> be possible to do the tape calculations in a much more sane manner.
> I'll take a look at this in more detail and see how easy it would
> be to do...
Please look into this. My one caution is that with in-drive compression,
you can only gestimate how much you'll get on the tape. :-(
Take care,
Bill