Subject: Re: Neighbour Discovery Bug?
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Feico Dillema <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/21/1999 20:08:40
On Wed, Jul 21, 1999 at 06:08:47PM +0200, Feico Dillema wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 1999 at 01:44:27PM +0200, Feico Dillema wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 20, 1999 at 08:33:45PM +0200, Feico Dillema wrote:
Forgot to mention: the setup still has a problem. without ND (as IPv4
equivalent of proxy-arp) other hosts on the network with prefix
3ffe:2a00:100:3002::/64 (e.g. ethernet xl0 or other tunnels) cannot
get to the `link-local' hosts behind a tunnel. (again for me not a
real problem, as I can give each tunnel a different prefix, but
thought I'd mention it `for the archives').
> route add -inet6 -host 3ffe:2a00:100:3002:10:4bff:fea4:548c fe80:6::210:4bff:fe32:7df7
> on the router end, `everything' (except ND) works. Of course, having to do this, kinda
> defeats the point of autoconfiguration a bit as this route needs to be configured
> manually. Ah well, I can wait till ND over tunnels gets fixed. A only have a few
> tunnels running temporarily, but I can imagine for an ISP wanting to give its
> clients IPv6 via tunneling (i.e. potentially lots) this is a real showstopper...