Subject: Re: better w(1)
To: Chris Jones <email@example.com>
From: Todd Vierling <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/21/1999 18:56:53
On 21 Jun 1999, Chris Jones wrote:
: matthew> i installed this a few weeks ago and it's great. it looks
: matthew> exactly like our w(1) except that it ignores utmp and uses
: matthew> the process list to find out who is doing what on which tty!
: matthew> most excellent.
: Cool. But there's definitely a reason that these programs (xterm,
: screen, etc.) allow users to not create utmp entries.
There's also a reason some of us admins don't want lusers to see us online
without requiring some degree of tedium. Sure, I wouldn't mind the
process-based tty list to be a command line option of w(1), but as default,
`yecch.' I'm also Very Glad that talk(1) won't even attempt to talk to
someone not in utmp. (My .screenrc has `deflogin off' for a reason. :)
-- Todd Vierling (email@example.com)