Subject: Re: SETI@home clients being built
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Izumi Tsutsui <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/20/1999 08:07:49
> > Yes, it seems doing many FFTs.
> Hmm... I was always under the assumption that the FFT was by definition
> an optimized discrete Fourier transform, and thus no floating point was
Well, I'm not familiar with both SETI and FFT...
At least, a rc5-64 client on CATS is ~17 times as fast as
a sparc client on SS1+. It has SA-110 optimized code, though.