Subject: Re: SETI@home clients being built
To: None <>
From: Izumi Tsutsui <>
List: current-users
Date: 06/20/1999 08:07:49
In <> wrote:

> > Yes, it seems doing many FFTs.
> Hmm...  I was always under the assumption that the FFT was by definition
> an optimized discrete Fourier transform, and thus no floating point was
> used.

Well, I'm not familiar with both SETI and FFT...

At least, a rc5-64 client on CATS is ~17 times as fast as
a sparc client on SS1+. It has SA-110 optimized code, though.
Izumi Tsutsui