Subject: Re: krb5 integration proposal
To: Simon Burge <email@example.com>
From: Aidan Cully <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/09/1999 02:55:18
On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 01:41:29PM +1000, Simon Burge wrote:
> Aidan Cully wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 12:07:36PM +1000, Simon Burge wrote:
> > > Aidan Cully wrote:
> > > > 4) Reorganize libtelnet, according to my local model.
> > > > This means the following hierarchy:
> > > > src/lib/libtelnet -- almost all libtelnet sources.
> > > > src/lib/libtelnet/Nocrypt -- libtelnet source that might be overridden
> > > > by crypto-enabled files.
> > >
> > > Can this be done with the right PATH magic so we don't need the Nocrypt
> > > subdirectory? It's a tad non-aesthetic, as well as making imports of
> > > new versions of libtelnet a little more work (if that were to ever
> > > happen again)...
> > I do it this way for .PATH reasons.. krb5 comes with a complete libtelnet
> > distribution, and domestic/lib/libtelnet reaches over into it.. One of my
> > goals was to use as much NetBSD source as possible, and only hook into
> > MIT's for kerberos specific stuff, and I couldn't see a good way to let
> > domestic/lib/libtelnet use MIT's encrypt.[ch], and NetBSD's ~everything
> > else without creating the Nocrypt/ subdirectory.
> > What sort of thing would you suggest?
> I'm not sure I see the problem. As an example, I've got the
> following directory structure:
> Is this more-or-less what we're after, or am I misunderstanding the
I believe you're misunderstanding the problem.. Add a file
and get the domestic/telnet/Makefile to use the misc.c in ./telnet