Subject: Re: krb5 integration proposal
To: Aidan Cully <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Simon Burge <email@example.com>
Date: 06/09/1999 12:07:36
Aidan Cully wrote:
> I'm assuming kerberos5 is something we want in the tree. If it isn't,
> then it isn't.
> 4) Reorganize libtelnet, according to my local model.
> This means the following hierarchy:
> src/lib/libtelnet -- almost all libtelnet sources.
> src/lib/libtelnet/Nocrypt -- libtelnet source that might be overridden
> by crypto-enabled files.
Can this be done with the right PATH magic so we don't need the Nocrypt
subdirectory? It's a tad non-aesthetic, as well as making imports of
new versions of libtelnet a little more work (if that were to ever
The rest I don't have a problem with since it can't affect me here in