Subject: Re: krb5 integration proposal
To: Simon Burge <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Aidan Cully <email@example.com>
Date: 06/08/1999 23:01:38
On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 12:07:36PM +1000, Simon Burge wrote:
> Aidan Cully wrote:
> > 4) Reorganize libtelnet, according to my local model.
> > This means the following hierarchy:
> > src/lib/libtelnet -- almost all libtelnet sources.
> > src/lib/libtelnet/Nocrypt -- libtelnet source that might be overridden
> > by crypto-enabled files.
> Can this be done with the right PATH magic so we don't need the Nocrypt
> subdirectory? It's a tad non-aesthetic, as well as making imports of
> new versions of libtelnet a little more work (if that were to ever
> happen again)...
I do it this way for .PATH reasons.. krb5 comes with a complete libtelnet
distribution, and domestic/lib/libtelnet reaches over into it.. One of my
goals was to use as much NetBSD source as possible, and only hook into
MIT's for kerberos specific stuff, and I couldn't see a good way to let
domestic/lib/libtelnet use MIT's encrypt.[ch], and NetBSD's ~everything
else without creating the Nocrypt/ subdirectory.
What sort of thing would you suggest?