Subject: Re: krb5 integration proposal
To: matthew green <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Aidan Cully <email@example.com>
Date: 06/08/1999 23:18:10
On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 11:58:48AM +1000, matthew green wrote:
> 1) Move all exportable code and headers out of /usr/src/domestic.
> i assume you mean moving these to the master repository? unless you
> can provide an convincing argument that these are genuinely useful
> beyond their needs for kerberos, _please_ don't do this.
It's not a very good reason, but the reason I had was just to simplify
the initial make/make install process.. Actually, I've kind of lost
track of why I put this in the proposal.. I may have cleaned up around
the reason I had for it so that it's no longer remotely necessary..
Consider this part scratched.
> also, don't you mean to use `crypto-us' not `domestic' ? it would be
> helpful to use the new terminology :-)
I was kind of waiting for the future of cryptography in NetBSD to settle
down a bit before committing to anything. :-)
I'd rather not be the person to do the necessary CVS magic to rename the
> Perhaps this directory should be domestic/dist/krb5?
> using a `dist' strategy would be winning.
> 6) Make krb4 a package (to help with people upgrading from k4, at least..)
> shouldn't you do this first, really, before breaking anything? :-)
Thanks for the feedback..