Subject: Re: Routing problem, what am I doing wrong?
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Paul Newhouse <email@example.com>
Date: 05/25/1999 15:56:48
>> On Tue, 25 May 1999 Paul Goyette wrote:
>> Ok, traceroute shows the next hop is:
>> 1 tc3-1-hfc.stcla1.sfba.home.net (18.104.22.168) 16.235 ms 14.679 ms 14.715 ms
>> this corresponds to what I was told when they installed the cable modem. It supposedly
>> is my gateway address on the cable network.
>> So I should add a route like:
>> route add -net 24 -netmask 255.0.0.0 22.214.171.124
>> and for ftp.netbsd.org
>> route add -net ftp.netbsd.org 126.96.36.199
>Why are you adding a route to ftp.netbsd.org?
I was going to download the latest tar_files and I was trying to use the
cable modem to see what kind of speeds I get as opposed to my DSL line
which does about 16-16.8 pretty regularly.
>Also, why are you adding a -net route for it? Both actions are wrong.
OOpppss, I cut and pasted the -net 24 line and didn't clean it up
correctly. No -net on the ftp.netbsd.org route line.
>I think you want a much simpler routing setup than you're giving yourself.
>I think all you want in addition to local routes and the loopback routes
>is "route add default 188.8.131.52".
NO!! *8^) My DSL line is the default route and it seems to work just fine
and I don't want to make the cable modem the default route since it's flaky.
(I've hooked it up to a box where it is the default route and it performs
very strangely. I mean it has other problems than this alternate interface
route problem I'm having.)
>You shouldn't need to enter a route for the cable modem as the ifconfig
>for the ethernet card on the cable side should have done it. I think the
>184.108.40.206/27 link#3 UC 0 0 - ne0
>line was all you needed.
Well, as I've said, I'm obviously missing something but, I don't see what.
Routing to .202 is wrong. If I route to .193 I get nothing. No tcpdump
results on any of the interfaces.