On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 05:48:09PM -0700, Chris G. Demetriou wrote:
> David Maxwell <david@fundy.ca> writes:
> > Probably not a problem, unless I put in support for all the FS types that
> > aren't in the code yet too.
> 
> Realistically, operations on FS type names shouldn't happen often
> enough that you need to worry about efficiency.

True. I misphrased that. I meant to say 'even if I add support for all
our FS types, only certain programs would suffer.'

> > This is for a native NetBSD m3 compiler.
> Feh, you're going to take away a flame war topic?!  How could you?

Easy. And I'll recommend now that we rewrite /etc/rc in m3, and
move to an /etc/rc.d/ model, if that helps? ;-)

Actually. I hope to get a native i386 version working, then start
cross-compiling native compilers for the other archs I have.

I'll let people know when I've got something real to speak of.

-- 
David Maxwell, david@vex.net|david@maxwell.net --> Mastery of UNIX, like
mastery of language, offers real freedom. The price of freedom is always dear,
but there's no substitute. Personally, I'd rather pay for my freedom than live
in a bitmapped, pop-up-happy dungeon like NT. - Thomas Scoville