Subject: re: union filesystem problems
To: Bill Sommerfeld <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: matthew green <email@example.com>
Date: 05/12/1999 10:22:48
of course, one would then need some sort of "remove" or "delete"
I'm sure I'm not the first person to think of this sort of thing...
i've often want a `nooptions' keyword that turned *off* a previously
enabled option (that, was, eg, obtained from an included, system
owned, file). devices are another matter, though.