Subject: Re: union filesystem problems
To: Todd Vierling <email@example.com>
From: Chris G. Demetriou <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/11/1999 22:42:35
Couple of comments:
Todd Vierling <email@example.com> writes:
> On 11 May 1999, Chris G. Demetriou wrote:
> : Realistically, given their current level of functionality, what
> : fraction of users find _any_ real utility from NULLFS, KERNFS, FDESC,
> : PORTAL, UMAPFS, PROCFS, or UNION? How many users actually care about
> Procfs, most definitely. Saved my ass with `ps' twice now.
Not clear it's so useful if it's what you're intending to ship in the
generic kernel for _releases_. i mean, in releases (or snapshots 8-),
the kernel and 'ps' is supposed to be consistent.
> : the UFS QUOTA code, or XNS, CCITT, or ISO networking? It's not an
> : insignificant number, but i'd bet there's a high correlation between
> : that set of users and the set that has a strong understanding of what
> : to put in a kernel config.
> Yes; however, the QUOTA code is likely used by far more people than the
> CCITT/ISO code. (I was meaning to ask why it wasn't in an alpha GENERIC.)
Actually, I'm not convinced that QUOTA has ever been adequately tested
on the alpha... 8-)
> Now ... yes, I agree that we should have a way of doing an "everything"
> kernel different from a "support most things" kernel, but we need to
> STANDARDIZE THE FORMAT of the bloody config files (can someone say pmax?).
I only agree with this if the way you get there isn't by including
N files from an MI place to get those options. People should be able
to read config files and figure out what's going on without having to
read N other files.
> Also, standardize what MI options go in the "support most things" kernel.
I'd argue that, despite the fact that, say, both adosfs and filecorefs
are MI file systems, the amiga doesn't need filecorefs and the ARM
doesn't need adosfs. 8-)
> We also need to make sure these things are kept up to date, and that the
> "support most things" kernel has *everything* listed in the "everything"
> kernel, with the appropriate things commented out, not "missing".
yes. For the alpha, i used to do this with 'diff ALPHA GENERIC' |
grep for either '<' or '>' (i forget).
Chris Demetriou - firstname.lastname@example.org - http://www.netbsd.org/People/Pages/cgd.html
Disclaimer: Not speaking for NetBSD, just expressing my own opinion.