Subject: Re: US crypto export resctrictions 'unconstitutional'
To: Aidan Cully <email@example.com>
From: Tracy J. Di Marco White <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/07/1999 22:26:28
Aidan Cully wrote:
}On Fri, May 07, 1999 at 03:28:08PM -0700, Jonathan Stone wrote:
}> In message <199905071902.PAA01709@ghost.whirlpool.com>,
}> Andrew Gillham writes:
}> >Perry E. Metzger writes:
}> >> 2) Domestic is worthless anyway. Who wants 1DES based Kerb IV anyway?
}> >So why is this "broken" implementation still in the tree then?
}> Our intree krb4 works well with both AFS and MIT v4 KDCs, Since krb5
}> has v4 backward compatiblity) it works with krb , our krb4 also
}> interoperates with krb5.
}There are a couple of issues, IIRC.. In particular, I'm pretty sure
}the domestic 'passwd' program doesn't work with krb5's kadmind4.. This
}is a fairly easy fix, but I'm not too worried about getting to it since
}krb5 integration shouldn't take that much more work.
In the version of krb5 we just installed, kadmind4 wouldn't work with
the k4 passwd program. I believe one of our local programmers did a
bit of hacking on it to get it to work with the k4 passwd programs we
have scattered around. I could be mistaken, but I'm relatively sure
that was one of the problems he found/fixed, anyway.
Tracy J. Di Marco White
Project Vincent Systems Manager