Subject: Re: US crypto export resctrictions 'unconstitutional'
To: Andrew Gillham <>
From: Bill Studenmund <>
List: current-users
Date: 05/07/1999 12:34:40
On 7 May 1999, Perry E. Metzger wrote:

> Andrew Gillham <> writes:
> > Perry E. Metzger writes:
> > > 2) Domestic is worthless anyway. Who wants 1DES based Kerb IV anyway?
> > 
> > So why is this "broken" implementation still in the tree then?

Because it is useful in certain settings. When I was at Stanford, I used
it all the time, quite effectively.

Take care,