Subject: Re: CVSup collections for a NetBSD CVS tree
To: Greg A. Woods <email@example.com>
From: Chris G. Demetriou <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/03/1999 17:56:01
email@example.com (Greg A. Woods) writes:
> In addition there's nothing anywhere I can find in the published NetBSD
> goals that says a tool has to be 100% ported before it can be used to
> offer services under the netbsd.org name.
I may have missed something here, but:
are there _any_ implementations of m3 which are capable of running
CVSup which run natively (i.e. not under emulation) on _any_ netbsd
platform? (Last i checked, at least SRC m3 ran on no NetBSD platforms,
but I haven't checked since before I left Digital 8-9 months ago.)
Note also that there's a big difference between a simple piece of
software and a language that needs to be ported to run a somewhat
complex piece of software to access a service.
To be honest, i wouldn't start advocating a NetBSD CVSup service
until, say, half of the architectures NetBSD supports have a working
native m3 implementation capable of running it.
Chris Demetriou - firstname.lastname@example.org - http://www.netbsd.org/People/Pages/cgd.html
Disclaimer: Not speaking for NetBSD, just expressing my own opinion.