Subject: RE: CVSup collections for a NetBSD CVS tree
To: Brian D Chase <>
From: Tom Javen <>
List: current-users
Date: 04/29/1999 11:08:01
On Thu, 29 Apr 1999, Brian D Chase wrote:

> On Thu, 29 Apr 1999, Tom Javen wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Apr 1999, Martin Husemann wrote:
> A nice benefit of porting CVSup to C is that people don't have to get very
> deep into worrying about platform specific details (as they would with
> porting a Modula-3 compiler).  It also means that if `n' increases,
> there's no additional cost to having CVSup run on that platform.  It
> scales better.  
> Hey I wouldn't mind having a Modula-3 compiler for my VAX, but I'm not
> going to be the one to port it.  Maybe we need a Modula-3 interpreter?  
> Or maybe we should instead port CVSup to perl so *everybody* can run it,
> including WinNT bozos.
Yes , and I would like to doscmd on my sun3....

You can still continue to use sup for your vax :^)
(as will I for my pc532)

Tom Javen                    |   Innotrac Diagnostics Oy
email  |   Finland
gsm   +358-40-5860532        |   phone +358-2-2410025
                             |   fax   +358-2-2410024