> I wrote:

> > I have long thought that NetBSD needs a single leader, rather than
> > "core."  Linux has Linux, FreeBSD has Jordan, and NetBSD has a
> > committee.

Ted Lemon <mellon@isc.org> writes:

> NetBSD doesn't need an autocrat.   NetBSD needs people to stop
> displaying their egos so boldly.   We all want to help, and are doing
> good work.   That's good, and we should be happy about it.

I never said that NetBSD needs a single person to manage things like
commits, but I do think NetBSD needs a single _managerial_ focus.

Looking at the projects that have succeeded, nearly every one of them
has this.  NetBSD does not, and I think that is what is hurting us.

--Michael