Subject: Re: Thought for the day...
To: NetBSD-current Discussion List <email@example.com>
From: Gandhi woulda smacked you <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 04/16/1999 01:22:08
[I've decided to jump into tech-kern, so I'm cc-ing there; please cc:
me for the next day or so until I can get subscribed for certain]
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, Greg A. Woods wrote:
# [ On Thursday, April 15, 1999 at 00:58:16 (-0700), Gandhi woulda smacked you wrote: ]
# > Subject: Thought for the day...
# Exactly. Set-id is designed to go through the filesystem because that's
# the best way to ensure integrity of the code that it is about to be
# given new privileges. That's also why most modern systems have been
# fixed so that writing to a set-id file turns off the set-id bits unless
# the writer is (already) the super-user.
My thoughts too, according to the current paradigm. I wouldn't change
those write/change semantics.
# With your proposed scheme you may as well just make /bin/sh set-id to
# the target user and/or group and be done with it because sooner or later
# someone will foil your "privilege broker" into giving away privs to a
# piece of un-trustworthy code that'll just run /bin/sh anyway. ;-)
Everything is fool-able on the first go-round. Security evolves.
Nonetheless, this is precisely the kind of input I was looking for!
# If you can come up with some scheme where the privilege broker can
# reliably get an fstat() of the open "text" file for the target process
# and can ensure that the process' text segment is unwritable, then
# perhaps you'd be a little safer, but I'm not really sure what this buys
# you. The broker can just as easily make available a setuid binary to do
# the same thing. If you've got processes that have to change privileges
# so fast that they'd be hindered by exec()ing a set-id binary then I
# think you've got a more basic design problem with your application.
I just thought that not needing to fiddle with fork/exec in order
to achieve secure setid would be more elegant.
Thankks for the input.
People who cannot be persuaded to use turn signals or ashtrays while driving
should not be permitted to drive.