Subject: Re: 14 Feb 1999 build fails
To: None <current-users@netbsd.org>
From: Nigel Reed <nigel@nelgin.nu>
List: current-users
Date: 02/15/1999 07:45:51
Still happening even after a distclean and a make build....any ideas anyone?

Should I be send-pring these things? If so...what category should they be
under?
install ? port-i386?

Regards
Nigel
----- Original Message -----
From: Nigel Reed <nigel@nelgin.nu>
To: Dave Huang <khym@bga.com>
Cc: <current-users@netbsd.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 14, 1999 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: 14 Feb 1999 build fails


>Strange, mine is the same, I did a sup and the make build.
>
>Maybe I'll do a distclean and then try a make build.
>
>Oh, this is i386 btw.
>
>Regards
>Nigel
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Dave Huang <khym@bga.com>
>To: Nigel Reed <nigel@nelgin.nu>
>Cc: <current-users@netbsd.org>
>Sent: Sunday, February 14, 1999 08:45 PM
>Subject: Re: 14 Feb 1999 build fails
>
>
>>On Sun, 14 Feb 1999, Nigel Reed wrote:
>>> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gdb/../../dist/gdb/blockframe.c: In function
>>> `flush_cached_
>>> frames':
>>> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gdb/../../dist/gdb/blockframe.c:216: `free'
>undeclared
>>> (fir
>>> st use in this function)
>>
>>> Has a fix been committed for this?
>>
>>It's working for me:
>>-rw-rw-r--  1 root  wheel  34868 Feb 11 06:09 blockframe.c
>>
>>And line 216 of blockframe.c is:
>>  obstack_init (&frame_cache_obstack);
>>
>>There's no mention of free anywhere in flush_cached_frames()...
>>--
>>Name: Dave Huang     |   Mammal, mammal / their names are called /
>>INet: khym@bga.com   |   they raise a paw / the bat, the cat /
>>FurryMUCK: Dahan     |   dolphin and dog / koala bear and hog -- TMBG
>>Dahan: Hani G Y+C 23 Y++ L+++ W- C++ T++ A+ E+ S++ V++ F- Q+++ P+ B+ PA+
>PL++
>>
>>
>
>
>