Subject: Re: do we really have to "break" 'tar -o' *again*?!?!
To: Bill Sommerfeld <email@example.com>
From: Todd Vierling <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/06/1999 19:39:18
On Fri, 5 Feb 1999, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
: If one were to pay close attention to the different -o options cited,
: one would notice that one only affects archive creation, while the
: other only affects archive extraction.
: Thus, these two features are not, strictly speaking, in conflict, and
: can thus share the same option letter in the interests of maximal
: backwards and standards compatibility.
That's actually a VERY intelligent point.
I'm going to make -o do the following:
- write V7 format archives (which, though part of GNU tar, actually
goes along with the following point--after all, old pax-as-tar created
V7 archives by default);
- write archives with "write_opt=nodir", as pax already did, and as
specified by 4.2BSD;
- extract archives with owner/group set to invoking user, as specified
This should make everyone happy.
-- Todd Vierling (Personal email@example.com; Bus. firstname.lastname@example.org)