Subject: Re: make(1) feature request: $<
To: Johnny C. Lam <lamj@stat.cmu.edu>
From: Geoff Wing <gcw@pobox.com>
List: current-users
Date: 01/03/1999 12:26:09
Johnny C. Lam wrote about Re: make(1) feature request: $<:
:mason@primenet.com.au (Geoff Wing) typed:
:> Hubert Feyrer <feyrer@rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de> typed:
:> :It seems our make doesn't support $< as synonym for ${.ALLSRC}.
:> :There is a number of (free) software out there that utilizes this feature,
:> :which is provided by GNU make. Having this also in our make(1) would help
:> :a bit. Thanks!
:> Huh? Sure it supports $< but it's not a synonym for ${.ALLSRC} and it's
:> not supposed to be. RTFM make(1):
:> Local variables
:> [....]
:> .ALLSRC The list of all sources for this target; also known as
:> `>'.
:> [....]
:> .IMPSRC The name/path of the source from which the target is to
:> be transformed (the ``implied'' source); also known as
:> `<'.
:> Can you give an example of it failing to work?
:I think in GNU make, $< is indeed a synonym for ${.ALLSRC}.
>From GNU make info:
`$<'
The name of the first dependency. If the target got its commands
from an implicit rule, this will be the first dependency added by
the implicit rule (*note Implicit Rules::.).
No, $< is not a synonym for ${.ALLSRC} in GNU make - but it has a
different meaning to our (mainly pmake based with some extensions,
e.g. VPATH) make.
:When I made the math/R package, I had to make a lot of identical changes
:to makefiles that looked like (pseudo-diff format):
That's just people's shortsightedness (or lack of platform testing capability)
and overdependence on GNU make. You can probably find a stack of programs
written by Linux users (who've never used another platform) suffering from
this.
Regards,
--
Geoff Wing <gcw@pobox.com> Mobile : 0412 162 441
Work URL: http://www.primenet.com.au/ Ego URL: http://pobox.com/~gcw/