Subject: Re: aix7xxx problems with negotiating "Ultra" speeds....
To: NetBSD-current Discussion List <email@example.com>
From: Greg A. Woods <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/10/1998 02:28:05
[ On Mon, December 7, 1998 at 23:03:07 (+0100), Guenther Grau wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: aix7xxx problems with negotiating "Ultra" speeds....
> > -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
> > -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
> > Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU
> > proven 100 4017 24.9 3988 9.5 2293 5.9 8197 53.5 9151 12.8 94.8 2.0
> What are the benchmarks like under FreeBSD?
Unfortunately I don't currently have enough resources to actually
install enough of FreeBSD-3.0 on this system and run any tests. (Not to
mention that there seems to be something wrong with the copy of the
3.0-RELEASE fixit floppy I got to the extent that I couldn't even ftp
the dmesg output off of the system).
I was hoping FreeBSD would recognize the partition table and allow me
to mount the NetBSD filesystems, even read-only, but this most
definitely did not work.....
> Do we want CAM in NetBSD???
CAM *must* eventually get into NetBSD if NetBSD is to keep current with
SCSI standards. Whether or not the FreeBSD implementation is integrated
is a separate and subordinate question.
> Not me, but why has the machine on 64 MB RAM. This looks like it might
> become a bottleneck sooner than hd-preformance :-)
Well, yes, but for now as a headless single-user development server it
should server quite fine. My primary Sparc-2 server has only 64MB RAM
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP <email@example.com> <robohack!woods>
Planix, Inc. <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Secrets of the Weird <email@example.com>