Subject: Re: aix7xxx problems with negotiating "Ultra" speeds....
To: NetBSD-current Discussion List <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Guenther Grau <Guenther.Grau@bk.bosch.de>
Date: 12/09/1998 22:22:45
Leo Weppelman wrote:
> > No, evaluate as to whether the technology and implementation is desirable
> > within NetBSD before someone goes to the substantial effort to get it into
> > NetBSD, only to find it doesn't meet with vox populi approval.
I strongly agree with this!
> I think Matthew is right here. A major undertaking like this should be
> backed by 'core'. I think that 'core' should state something like:
> - if it performs at least as well as the current system
> - if it works at least as well as the current system wrt. error
> recovery, command handling etc.
> it will be accepted.
If above requirements are met, some more arguments for the CAM
o easier sharing drivers between FreeBSD and NetBSD
o same APIs in FreeBSD/NetBSD
o convergence of code between FreeBSD/NetBSD
FreeBSD/NetBSD shouldn't be trying to be just different. Instead we
try to work hand in hand, as much as possible.
And to some other mails concerning this topic:
Please don't bring up any arguments about who opposed the integration
of CAM when and why. This won't help. Things happened in the past the
way they happened. I found a nice quote on a web site which explains
best what we should do, IMHO:
Solve problems rather than assign blame.